Stop handing beta readers your book with no instructions


Longtime readers might remember when I used to do the 3@3. New readers, welcome to the explanation: a few years back, I used to go live once a week at 3pm and answer 3 questions that had been pre-submitted. It was all live, no editing, just raw talk. Turns out, I've got a pile of those clips sitting around, and honestly, most of the advice hasn't aged a day. Would I add some information or say it a bit different? Maybe. But these are still so solid, I decided to resurrect them and share them with you again!

The question this time:

When self-editing before querying, at what point should you bring in beta readers, and at what point should you stop getting feedback and hit submit?

This one hinges on a distinction a lot of authors blur together: alpha readers, critique partners, and beta readers are not the same thing, and they don't come in at the same point.

Alpha readers and critique partners see the rough stuff, sometimes really rough, at various points while you're still writing and revising. Beta readers come later. Beta, as in testing, means the draft is essentially done and you're finding out what still needs fixing before it goes further, whether that's to an agent, an editor, or straight to publication.

One thing a lot of authors get wrong with beta readers specifically: don't just hand over the manuscript and ask "what did you think?" Give them specific things to look for, specific questions to answer. General feedback from a beta reader is rarely as useful as targeted feedback.

​So, when do you stop and hit submit? (My full answer in the video at the link!)

Once you've selected your beta readers, gotten their feedback, and fixed what they've flagged, that's your submit point for querying. If you're self-publishing instead, beta readers can come at different spots around your editing rounds, sometimes before your editor sees it, sometimes after, to catch anything still unclear.

If you want the deeper breakdown of exactly which reader type belongs where in your process, Edit Your Way has a full chapter on this, alpha readers, critique partners, beta readers, and how to use each one well.

And still asking: would you want live 3@3 back, or something like it, so you could bring your own questions?

Happy writing!

~Angela
​

This is a paid sponsorship. If you click, we get a small commission. No further action is needed from you, so just clicking on the sponsorship helps us pay for this newsletter!

Angela James

Join my newsletter for publishing, writing and marketing tips and advice! Angela James (she/her) is a #1 New York Times bestselling fiction freelance editor and author career coach, and has enjoyed two decades in genre fiction publishing. She's edited bestselling books and authors, including the #1 New York Times bestselling Paper Princess by Erin Watt, as well as hundreds of other authors such as Mariah Stewart, Shelly Laurenston/G.A. Aiken, A.C. Arthur, Jaci Burton, Ilona Andrews, Alexa Riley, Lilith Saintcrow, Josh Lanyon, K.A. Mitchell, Shannon Stacey, and more. She is also the creator of Before You Hit Send: a popular online self-editing and writing workshop as well as Book Boss: From Written to Recommended, a supportive and growing author community. For more information about Angela’s freelance editorial and consulting services visit angelajames.co.

Read more from Angela James

Hey Reader, Last week I was stru-guh-ling. Things were feeling just rough for a variety of reasons, some of which aren't mine to share. But I was pretty sick last week, as was my husband, and so much of the world events and news had me bummed, as did some personal and business news. I was feeling sad, and run down, and just basically a little de-motivated. But I was fortunate to have gotten tickets to the Power to the People festival organized by Tom Morello in Columbia, MD, and go with my...

Hey Reader, Longtime readers might remember when I used to do the 3@3. New readers, welcome to the explanation: a few years back, I used to go live once a week at 3pm and answer 3 questions that had been pre-submitted. It was all live, no editing, just raw talk. Turns out, I've got a pile of those clips sitting around, and honestly, most of the advice hasn't aged a day. Would I add some information or say it a bit different? Maybe. But these are still so solid, I decided to resurrect them and...

Hey Reader, Longtime readers might remember when I used to do the 3@3. New readers, welcome to the explanation: a few years back, I used to go live once a week at 3pm and answer 3 questions that had been pre-submitted. It was all live, no editing, just raw talk. Turns out, I've got a pile of those clips sitting around, and honestly, most of the advice hasn't aged a day. Would I add some information or say it a bit different? Maybe. But these are still so solid, I decided to resurrect them and...